California is the largest "sub-national" economy in the world.
California is the world's fifth largest economy in the world.
If I told you it was currently being run in a "headless manner", by what can only be described initially as the fall-out from "multi-generational rogues" who may or may not still be involved, would you believe me?
What would it take for me to make that case?
If I told you that I could "prove" to you that over 750,000 licensed professionals in SIX or more professional industries were being run in an Organized and Openly Corrupt Manner and seemingly in rhythm with the Government Servants meant to oversee them, would you believe me?
If I told you this situation included a fully hijacked legal system
as the sheath for a commercially deadly double edged sword, could you believe that?
Very Powerful and Advanced Communication skills involving the use of suggestion for misdirection, confusion for induction, gas-lighting, and feigned incompetence are all put on display if ever they come close to getting caught by the backside of a wave.
Summarized, these appear to be "inversionists".
People who live of their ability to be anti-social while tying others into mental and emotional knots with ease.
Are they actually all part of some "organized religion" or "cult" that has gone un-identified
by those not affiliated for decades or more?
How could they all be so related?
A few ex-Hollywood A-Listers have spoken out about a Legal and Accounting Mafia in California before.
Does this reveal that and a whole lot more?
When the BEST stories in History are suppressed, like Olde Khazaria and that of the Sabbatean Frankists,
it never makes sense until you know more...
In the Sections below I'm going to provide abridged facts related to the following Professional Groups and Industries. These are made up of "common" California Citizens that are operating in groups and gangs in a way that revealed a required level of coordination between Licensed Professionals and Government Oversight Bodies most would think incomprehensible.
California Association of Realtors (CAR)
California Residential Real Estate Brokerage Industry (440,000 Licensed Professionals)
California Real Estate Attorney Industry (a subset of 270,000 Licensed Professionals)
California Mediation Attorney Industry (a subset of 270,000 Licensed Professionals)
California Bar Association (270,000 Licensed Professionals with mandatory Membership Dues)
California Licensed Contractors (229,000 Licensed Professionals)
California Licensed Termite Inspectors (20,000+ Licensed Professionals)
California Home Inspectors (3,500 unregulated home inspectors )
The California Association of Realtors has “approved” a statewide contract for real estate transactions that is warrantied by no one, yet required for use by 440,000 licenses and their clients. The contract contains two gnarly clauses that leads sellers and buyers to believe facts about transaction procedure which are the exact OPPOSITE of what long standing Court Presidents, Accepted Real Estate Law, and CA 1102 specify for proper procedure.
The first gnarly clause suggests no disclosure documents are due to a Buyer prior to Transfer of Title at time of Contract Acceptance. This contradicts long standing Common Law, all relevant Case Precedents for "As Is" sales, and Laws governing Statutory Disclosure Documents set forth for the TDS in CA 1102.
The second gnarly clause suggests that a Seller is required to accept defects exposed during escrow to get to Deed Conveyance, even if the defects were found as part of a clear attempt at Disclosure misrepresentation. This also contradicts long standing Common Law and all relevant Case Precedents for "As Is" sales.
Typical Buyers and Sellers aren't Case Precedent Pros. The contract suggests to Consult Attorneys for Legal Matters. We did that, and when the Attorneys were asked, they didn't reveal those details either. "Uh ohhhh".
These misleading contract clauses and this "inverted contract" benefits CAR and the entire Legal Lobby of California by encouraging sellers to attempt things that are illegal. That creates voluminous amounts of unnecessary disputes that require mediation and legal services that would NOT be required with a transparent contract.
All Real Estate Attorneys and Mediation Companies benefit, but it gets worse. CAR is not just the catalyst in this process. CAR, the official "approver" of this Contract, also offers Mediation Services and that service promotion "advertisement" is included in the contract as part of this self dealing scheme.
With all this so apparent, how on Earth has it been covered up since 1985 and prior? Hold on to your britches for this one...
The contract requires Mediation prior to litigation to retain legal rights that should not be contingent on mediation. The contract does NOT, however, reveal that all mediation in California requires 100% CONFIDENTIALITY for all parties.
You haven't heard about this before because anyone harmed in a comparable manner would have gone into mediation, showed their cards, taken money that was due to them and stayed mum. Thus, allowing all of them to do it over and over again.
The Contract stipulates Mediation as a requirement for disputes between Seller and Buyer, if the Buyer wants to retain their rights to collecting Attorney fees in the event of a win, as is standard in California.
For the few who read the Contract Mediation Clause requirements, this seems a reasonable and logical request. The idea of having to give up ones rights to collecting legal fees for bypassing it seems odd, but the suggestion is made that that encourages load reduction on CA Courts.
HOWEVER, as it turns out, all Mediation in California requires full and complete Confidentiality, and that details is NOT disclosed in the CAR approved contract.
If a legal professional is asked, they will say that confidentiality helps people be honest in mediation. That's just a lie. Confidentiality in Mediation encourages lying, because no one can reveal it. It also allows for both Attorneys to present half truths and suggestions to Buyers and Sellers which buyers and sellers feel can never be revealed, and it provides a playing field for Attorneys to manipulate Buyers and Sellers into Confidential Agreements that keep this entire mess under wraps.
This is a situation in which one Hoax initiated by those in the California Legal Lobby covers another, which covers another, and all of them lead back to the California Legal Lobby with the Real Estate Brokers, Agents and Mediators now all in on the game and profiting from it too.
440,000 Licensed Real Estate Brokers and Agents are operating as Horse Traders under the guise of Brokerage. They are foisting inverted contracts on consumers that ALL OF THEM should know are fully ”insincere”. Real Estate Professionals with lesser ethics and morals can use the flawed contacts to encourage clients similarly situated that they can get away with things that Agents and Brokers with a higher bar for behavior will not take on. The contract confusion, if used effectively by those of lesser morals, becomes a sales tool and offers advantages for gaining listings that others would not take on. From what we understand, many prior Licensees with higher ethics have now left the industry due to a lack of desire to have to explain the potential for rot to those they represent. The result is now a festering swamp of corruption.
Broker and Agent Education Requirements - Initial Licensing requires 135 hours of education. Then there is a 45 hour continuing ed requirement for each 4 year license renewal. The first "rule" of real estate sales is "Disclose. Disclose. Disclose". With that in mind, details related to "As Is" sales and the required "Disclosure Laws" are supposed to be the single most important detail in real estate training. Yet, 440,000 of them feel comfortable working with a contract that inverts the requirement for Disclosure Delivery timing? What group that large feels that's okay and won't come crashing down some day?
The CA DRE - The California Department of Real Estate has been using an inverted contract to review Realtor behavior for decades. Let that sink in. A review of some of their dispute resolutions against agents reveals a startling level of lax oversight and arguably, criminal cover up.
A subset of 270,000 California Attorneys who identify as “Real Estate Attorneys” have used “required confidential mediation” to cover for CAR "approved" contract, the required use of the inverted CAR contract by Brokers and the Rogue Brokers and Agents foisting it on consumers with knowledge and intention. The confidentiality has prevented the light required to end the practices and resulted in repeating profit Schemes for decades for Brokers, Attorneys and Mediation Companies.
I have exposed an illogical engagement by a Water Rights Attorney in my case. He doesn't even seem to claim to be a Real Estate Attorney. He attempted to force ”confidentiality” on me in email dialogue in a unilateral manner with references to California Statutes that do not exist. He then attempted to intimidate me with patently false statements about the Mediation clause in my contract. He then fabricated written dialogue to stand in for disclosure statements not made by his client. And he did all this in writing, with seemingly no fear for retribution, presumably because he thought his first step at intimidation with the declared confidentiality would make me feel trapped. He made a great mark for a Bar Complaint and HELL is being unleashed on him.
A subset of 270,000 California Attorneys who identify as “Mediation Attorneys” have used “required confidential mediation” to cover for CAR "approved" contracts and all this Malfeasance too. The Mediation Attorneys would be the most versed and knowledgeable in all of this. They will all claim confidentiality prevents them from revealing details of their work. They are watching crime, after crime, after crime transpire and profiting from it.
I have emails with a Mediation Attorney who we engaged with and paid a consulting fee to during Escrow. I specifically wrote about contract clause concerns in my email(s). He ignored those concerns and behaved in a grossly inappropriate manner while feeling he was conveying "sound advice to someone in need". He has not been the subject of a Bar Complaint yet, and based on the RICO claims against the CA Bar, his outing will likely only come this way, but that is subject to change too.
The California Bar Association consists of 270,000 California Attorneys. The California Bar is approved to operate as a part of the Consumer Protection system in the State of California. It gets its funding from Attorneys and in California, all attorneys in the state are REQUIRED to pay dues and be members of the California Bar. It is not that way in all states.
As it turns out, the CA Bar is currently being sued for RACKETEERING. As it turns out, Bar Complaint Adjudicators have been accepting Bribes from their peers for looking past complaints. Over 700 Attorneys have 4 or more complaints against them with no disciplinary action and that's just the tip of the iceburg. In one situation being called out in the lawsuit and Attorney paid or intended to pay a Bar Counsel Adjudicator $1 Million dollars for looking the other way, and a portion of that money was run through the Bar Counsel Adjudicators wife, who is an Accountant/CPA. It was presented as payment for services, but when asked for proof of services rendered she produced nothing. Per an article, the Bar Counsel Adjudicator was fired. He then sued and won $400,000 and he and his Accounting wife moved to Arizona with seemingly no legal followup to this point.
Per Attorney Jay Edelson, a man infuriated by this situation, “The people there right now are not the good guys”. He went on to state, the system is “still protecting the bad guys” and it “needs to be leveled and reformed”.
https://www.davisvanguard.org/2023/05/the-california-state-bars-failure-to-hold-attorneys-accountable/
As part of my experience with the Water Law Attorney above and the Bar Complaint I filed, I have exposed the California Bar Association’s attempt to provide cover for him and that was AFTER this RICO lawsuit was made public and the Bar Leadership indicated change was in process. Furthermore, as a strange coincidence, I'm involved as the author of a second Bar Complaint, unrelated to Real Estate and this expeirence in which 3 Attorneys at two Law firms acted in a bizarre behavior when handling a Personal Injury claim. Our experience with that claim was so wild, it's now been appealed the CA Supreme Court. Our goal was to show CA Bar Malfeasance with no idea there was already a Racketeering Case in process. In our complaint it seems these attorneys may be involved in 1) a scheme to cheat Medical Providers from Settlement Money and/or 2) a scheme to defraud the Uninsured Motorist System AND the CA Bar claimed to have looked into those and dismissed those ideas, while providing information that indicates they didn't look into them at all, or were covering for them in other ways.
The Contractors State Licensing Board (CSLB) is faking the oversight for over 229,000 Licensed Contractors. The CSLB is patently ignoring the FIRST SENTENCE of the FIRST SECTION of the Consumer Protection Laws for Complaint Standing requirements (the first sentence of CA 7090).
That sentence states, “investigations shall be initiated for verified complaints filed by any person” (paraphrased for relevance).
Yet, in response to my complaint related to GROSS acts of concealment and fraud committed by a Contractor employed by the Seller and/or his Real Estate Agent, the CSLB closed my file because I didn't have a contract with the contractor.
The first level support person indicated that was their policy verbally. She could not explain how contractors who did work directly for Satan would be overseen or regulated.
A supervisor in that department with 10 years experience indicated that had been the policy during her entire employment. She was NOT able to provide reference to any state laws or office procedures that override the directives set forth in 7090.
The Supervisor's Supervisor is the person who signed the letter, and she was consulted by the first level support person during that call.
There was/is no inconsistency in messaging from three levels of California Employees or the Letter received closing my file.
Thus, as long as California Contractors please their paying clients, they will NEVER be investigated.
As it stands now, per these three California Employees and the letter we received, if the Contractor's Client is Satan himself, and if Satan asks the contractor to violate every law on the books, as long as Satan, the paying customer, is happy, there can be no complaints opened against the contractor for faulty work.
Per the CSLB, all complaints would need to be filed against Satan himself in civil court and no investigations can or will be initiated against the Contractor, because the Paying client is the one who establishes the Scope for Work.
Okay. We'll file a complaint against Satan himself. Even Satan has a boss.
From this information it’s currently safe to believe that NO proper investigations into malfeasance related to “fixing up real estate” have been handled properly for at least 10 years, and most likely 33 years or more.
The Structural Pest Control Board’s has no proper complaint acknowledgement process for managing and overseeing over 20,000 Licensed Professionals. In my case, I was initially notified by phone and a verbal attempt was made to willfully look past numerous egregious violations of procedure in a conversation clearly aimed at bamboozling the Citizen / Consumer by an experienced Agent. After that I created written dialogue and gathered evidence that suggests there were back door dealings between the SPCB and those they are supposed to regulate. Only after composing a 50+ page complaint and doing the work the Board should have done, did I get proper acknowledgment of complaint in writing and a referral to a legal enforcement contact. In that acknowledgment process I was presented with a “short” complaint ID with a numbering process that does NOT align with a “year-#” format. While this may seem like a trivial detail to most, that is a standard format for most regulatory agencies. A deviation from that type of numbering system makes it difficult to easily gain insight to complaint logging, and that aligns with my initial experience with them. I have also found complaints online about the SPCB which reveal nearly identical experiences from other Californians and suggest this has been a problem for at least a decade.
What I've just presented to you is a Racketeering Scenario which seems to span multiple industries that also INCLUDES the full control, manipulation and/or willful participation of California Government employees.
We've all become more familiar with the Corrupt Federal Government oversight bodies like the EPA, the FDA, the NIH. Many see some cross over between one or the other, but typically they are generally stand alone.
What I've just presented is the hijacking of a HALF of a states commercial system.
Commerce can typically be broken down into two groups. Real Estate Law and Commercial Law (commerce outside of real estate).
Has it been like this since California was formed?
The laws themselves are actually quite well written and the Case Precedents from the 1980s and 1990s seem reasonable even though evidence suggests this was transpiring since the 1980s.
The "who started this" and "when did it start" and "how did they get ______ to overlook the professionals they were meant to overlook" is still unclear.
Some may feel it's not necessary to figure that out. Others will feel it's necessary to determine if those that created this mess are still engaged, because fi they are, they will just do this again in another way, here or somewhere else, and that's a big deal that needs to be considered in greater detail.
A copy of these details were put into a written complaint and sent to Governor Newsom on 9/18/2023. A request for intervention and support was made. A response was demanded by 9/29/2023. The first suggestion made was the forced resignation of Rob Bonta, CA Attorney General.
For full details on the complaint correspondence, ,please see the "Formal Complaint" page..
California has a population of 40 Million with 440,000 real estate licensees. Does it make sense that 1.1% of all Californians of any age, not just working age, have a real estate license?
In 2023, it's been reported there were approximately 440,000 real estate transactions. That's approximately 1 per licensed professional but that works out to averaging 2 per licensed professional given each transaction requires two Licensees. (This omits the idea of Broker Supervision as non active transaction parties).
Does it make sense that "only" 3500 home inspectors could service this "army" of Agents and Brokers?
That would work out to 1200 home inspections per year per inspector, which would be 6 inspections per day assuming 5 day work weeks, (which is impossible).
But the math gets worse. Many homes will get two or more inspections.
Something seems very off with this math.
Is there some type of money laundering scheme running through all of this too? Are people claiming Realtor related income for handling the purchase and sale of properties that don't exist?
That is not a focus for this publishing even though Money Laundering via Real Estate is a suggestion for why all of this may have started many decades ago.
